Collectors Zhivopistseva in 2000 was stolen picture of the famous Russian artist of the XIX century. The investigation revealed that the painting kidnapped Smurov - a relative of the collector, which the latter usually left the key to his apartment during his trips. In 2006, artists were found stolen from him a picture at the exhibition, organized by the NGO "Contemporary Art Gallery". Artists turned to a partnership demanding the return of his apartment. The partnership has refused, citing the fact that bought the painting from specializing in antiques trade organization for a very high price. In addition, according to the partnership, the statute of limitations had expired. Painters filed a lawsuit for the recovery of the painting from the partnership.
What is the nature of the claimed Zhivopistsevym claim?
At what point should be calculated the limitation period for the protection of the broken right Zhivopistseva?
Subject to the satisfaction of any claim?
Spouses Belenky administration Oktyabrsky district of the Amur region was granted land for private farming. Within 2-3 years, they have specialized in the cultivation of certain types of vegetables, occupying a land given to them all the land, to give high yields.
A small part of the couple ate vegetables grown for their own needs and to ensure the needs of families. The rest of the harvest Belenky sold in urban markets and retailers have implemented.
In April 2009, the entrepreneur Zawidow Belenky offered to sell him for the rest of the garlic crop in 2008 for use on seeds. Belenky agreed and signed a contract of sale of garlic.
When packing of garlic is stored on one of the city's vegetable stores, Belenky found that he struck Phytophthora and can not be used as a seed. The couple abandoned the sale contract, citing the impossibility of its execution through the fault of vegetable stores, violated the conditions of storage of garlic.
Zawidow filed a lawsuit against the Belenky for damages caused by failure of the contract, stating that individuals engaged in entrepreneurial activities, absence of guilt is not a ground for exemption from liability.
Is it possible to recognize the activities carried out by Belenky business?
Whether a court to apply the resolution of the dispute n. 4 of Art. 23 of the Civil Code?
Will the solution, if the spouses Belenky created peasant (farmer) economy?