Civil law TSU TSU option 2

The sale of this product is temporarily suspended.

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

Uploaded: 30.05.2013
Content: 30530163554720.rar (28,25 kB)

Description

Civil law TSU TSU option 2 Civil law TSU TSU option 2 Civil law TSU TSU option 2 Civil law TSU TSU option 2

Problem number 1.
JSC "Foreign Company" Baltschug "" signed with the Chinese company imported a contract to supply China and 1,000 tons of black rolled.
Black rental has been listed as the subject of the transaction in all customs documents and documents of foreign exchange controls. When the customs inspection cargo, sent foreign trade company "Baltschug" to the Chinese import company, it was found that a few cars under the guise of a black rolled products are rare earth metals. During the investigation it was found that the company "Baltschug" had no right to export rare earth metals, and the purchase and sale of ferrous metal only covered the actual sale of rare earth metals. It was also established that the delivery was carried out with the condition of issuing the buyer a Russian bank irrevocable letter of credit.
Give a legal assessment of the situation.
Task 2
In October 2004, individuals and legal entities were created by JSC "Mayak". Charter stipulated that one of the founders of "Vistula"; contributed to the authorized capital 215 thousand. rub., that is 18.5% of the share capital. Ltd. "Vistula" assumed also the obligation to implement the design, installation work on the construction of facilities for the Company "Mayak". Reconciliation Act between JSC "Mayak" and OOO "Vistula" from 15.06.2006, the parties have confirmed that the company "Vistula" completed works amounting to 1456 rubles. The sides decided to set off against 215 thousand. Rub. as the contribution of "Vistula" in the authorized capital of JSC "Mayak" and the difference corporation paid the partnership funds.
In March 2007, the general meeting of shareholders ZAOZ "Mayak" LLC "Vistula" was excluded from the shareholders for the disclosure of trade secrets. Ltd. "Vistula" appealed to the arbitration court for recognition of ownership of the share capital of JSC "Mayak" and recognition of the right to the property of the company in the amount of 18.5% of total assets. The court found the plaintiff's claim valid.
Assess the circumstances of the case. Is the court's decision lawful and justified?
Task number 2.
Make transfer interest bill provided with three endorsements (one of which must be blank, and others - and pereporuchitelnym collateral), accompanying the aval, and accepted by the drawee.

Additional information

Civil law TSU TSU option 2
Problem number 1.
JSC "Foreign Company" Baltschug "" signed with the Chinese company imported a contract to supply China and 1,000 tons of black rolled.
Black rental has been listed as the subject of the transaction in all customs documents and documents of foreign exchange controls. When the customs inspection cargo, sent foreign trade company "Baltschug" to the Chinese import company, it was found that a few cars under the guise of a black rolled products are rare earth metals. During the investigation it was found that the company "Baltschug" had no right to export rare earth metals, and the purchase and sale of ferrous metal only covered the actual sale of rare earth metals. It was also established that the delivery was carried out with the condition of issuing the buyer a Russian bank irrevocable letter of credit.
Give a legal assessment of the situation.
Task 2
In October 2004, individuals and legal entities were created by JSC "Mayak". Charter stipulated that one of the founders of "Vistula"; contributed to the authorized capital 215 thousand. rub., that is 18.5% of the share capital. Ltd. "Vistula" assumed also the obligation to implement the design, installation work on the construction of facilities for the Company "Mayak". Reconciliation Act between JSC "Mayak" and OOO "Vistula" from 15.06.2006, the parties have confirmed that the company "Vistula" completed works amounting to 1456 rubles. The sides decided to set off against 215 thousand. Rub. as the contribution of "Vistula" in the authorized capital of JSC "Mayak" and the difference corporation paid the partnership funds.
In March 2007, the general meeting of shareholders ZAOZ "Mayak" LLC "Vistula" was excluded from the shareholders for the disclosure of trade secrets. Ltd. "Vistula" appealed to the arbitration court for recognition of ownership of the share capital of JSC "Mayak" and recognition of the right to the property of the company in the amount of 18.5% of total assets. The court found the plaintiff's claim valid.
Assess the circumstances of the case. Is the court's decision lawful and justified?
Task number 2.
Make transfer interest bill provided with three endorsements (one of which must be blank, and others - and pereporuchitelnym collateral), accompanying the aval, and accepted by the drawee.

Civil law TSU TSU option 2
Civil law TSU TSU option 2
Civil law TSU TSU option 2
Civil law TSU TSU option 2
Civil law TSU TSU option 2

Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
Period
1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)