# Logic, MSLA

Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

Content: 1930-khgfg.rar (15,88 kB)

# Description

Chapter 1.
Exercise 15.
Determine the type of relationships between concepts, draw it with a circular pattern.
Exercise 18.
Limit concept.
18.6. The form of thinking.
Exercise 24.
Set correctly the following definitions (in the wrong definitions specify which rule is violated).
24.6. Theft - a crime against property, consisting in the theft of another's property.
Exercise 28.
Check the division of concepts; in the wrong division, specify which rules are broken.
28.6. Transactions are bilateral, multilateral and wills.
Chapter 2.
Exercise 4.
These attributive judgments find the subject, predicate and ligaments. Determine the quantity and quality of judgments, specify if it is, quantifier words. The schemes judgments.
4.6. The days of late autumn is usually scold.
Exercise 6.
Give unified classification judgments, draw relationships between terms using Euler diagram, determine the distribution of subject and predicate.
6.6. Love for all ages.
Exercise 11.
Specify the connection and separation judgments in the past - type of disjunction (strict or not strict, complete or incomplete), give a symbolic entry of judgment. If the judgment is not expressed in explicit logical form, specify it using the word "and" and "or".
11.6. The grounds for termination of land are falling or need to use the land or the voluntary renunciation of user rights or the expiration of the term for which it was granted.
Exercise 12.
Specify the antecedent and consequent of conditional and equivalent judgments, give them a symbolic record. If the judgment is not expressed in explicit logical form, specify it using the ligaments, "If ... then ..." and "if and only if ..., then ...".
12.6. The investigator is entitled to conduct an investigative experiment if necessary to clarify the details of the case.
Chapter 3.
Exercise 1.
Make a conclusion by conversion, make output circuit. If the parcel is not expressed in explicit logical form, convert it according to the judgment circuits A, E, I, O.
1.6. No transactions aimed at restricting the legal capacity is not valid.
Exercise 6.
Check the circulation. If the call is wrong, draw the right conclusions. Chart display.
6.6. Some lawyers - Law teacher in high schools.
Some teachers of legal disciplines at universities - lawyers.

Exercise 10.
Build logical square. Based on it, display the opposite judgment, and contrary slave data. Set their truth or falsity.
10.6. Every citizen has the right to defend itself.
Exercise 11.
Fulfill the conditions of exercise. 10, output from these judgments contrary, partial compatibility and obey the judgment, set their truth or falsity.
11.6. Most Irish people speak English.
Chapter 4.
Exercise 3.
Using conditional premise, build reasoning: a) approver; b) denies modus, build their scheme in symbolic notation. If the conditional premise is not expressed explicitly, specify it in the obvious logical form (with a bunch of "if ... then ...").
3.6. Evidence obtained in violation of the law, have no legal force.
Exercise 5.
Make a conclusion from the premises, set whether or not he needed.
5.6. If the state is secular, it does not interfere with the legitimate activities of religious associations. The state is secular.
Exercise 7.
Using a separation package, build reasoning: a) utverzhdayusche-denier; b) by negating-approver modus; based on the mode of the scheme, determine whether the need to conclude from the premises.
7.6. Piece wages may be individual or collective.
Exercise 8.
Formulate arguments in one of the modes of separation and definitive conclusions, build his scheme.
8.6. During the investigation into the murder of D. - conductors wagon - the investigator suggested that the murder was committed by a close friend of the victim or another conductor of the car, follow the same composition, or someone from the other railway employees. Penetration into the car at night outsiders seemed unlikely, especially since before leaving the conductors have been specifically instructed. It was found that the murder was committed on the road section between the stations and K. R. and that the train, which followed the car, there were four cars with conductors Z., B., H. and C.
The assumption that the DA was killed by a conductor C, which seemed plausible at first, the investigation has not been confirmed. Participation in this crime conductors S. excluded because the murder was accompanied by attempted rape.
The version of the crime conductor H., given his advanced age and the relatively poor health, was unlikely. It has disappeared and speculation about the murder of D. any of her close friends.

# Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
 Period 1 month 3 months 12 months 0 0 0 0 0 0
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)