- Arts & Culture 5935
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 310
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 75718
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2221
- Coursework 15444
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 574
- Ecology 5
- Economy 83
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17597
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 2
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13850
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14821
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 150
- Tests 9243
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 362
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3059
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
MSLA control Civil percent right Var 1
Uploaded: 16.07.2013
Content: 999.rar 11,16 kB
Product description
Objective 1.
The District Court considered the civil case on the dispute between the former spouses Timiryakovym Pestova and sharing of joint property.
Investigating the case, the defendant filed a motion Timiryakov to adjourn the proceedings to review the Pestova represented at the hearing trademarks checks confirming the purchase of household appliances. The judge refused to satisfy such a request, recommending that the respondent acquainted with these documents during the process.
After reading the testimony of the mother Pestova, written by her own hand, because as a witness in the case, it is due to illness was unable to appear at the hearing, the judge admitted the receipts, which did not have time to read Timiryakov. Decision of the court action was satisfied.
What are the principles of civil procedural rights have been violated? What is expressed? What is the content of violated principles?
Objective 2.
Member of the Legislative Assembly of the RF subject Sheshukov appealed to the city court for contesting certain provisions of the Regulations of the Legislative Assembly of the subject.
City Court Judge denied the application, citing the fact that the deputies of legislative (representative) bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation are not assigned to a circle of persons who are granted the right to appeal to the court contesting regulatory legal acts motivated by violations of their parliamentary rights adopted body, which are directly included, as well as to challenge such regulations in connection with the violation of their parliamentary competences.
Subsequently, a similar statement to the court appealed the prosecutor of the RF subject. The judge accepted the application for review, held a hearing in which the prosecutor made a conclusion on the case. Decision of the court application was granted.
Are the actions of the court? What procedural order of consideration and resolution of cases on challenging normative legal acts?
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |