The District Court considered the civil case on the dispute between the former spouses Timiryakovym Pestova and sharing of joint property.
Investigating the case, the defendant filed a motion Timiryakov to adjourn the proceedings to review the Pestova represented at the hearing trademarks checks confirming the purchase of household appliances. The judge refused to satisfy such a request, recommending that the respondent acquainted with these documents during the process.
After reading the testimony of the mother Pestova, written by her own hand, because as a witness in the case, it is due to illness was unable to appear at the hearing, the judge admitted the receipts, which did not have time to read Timiryakov. Decision of the court action was satisfied.
What are the principles of civil procedural rights have been violated? What is expressed? What is the content of violated principles?
Member of the Legislative Assembly of the RF subject Sheshukov appealed to the city court for contesting certain provisions of the Regulations of the Legislative Assembly of the subject.
City Court Judge denied the application, citing the fact that the deputies of legislative (representative) bodies of subjects of the Russian Federation are not assigned to a circle of persons who are granted the right to appeal to the court contesting regulatory legal acts motivated by violations of their parliamentary rights adopted body, which are directly included, as well as to challenge such regulations in connection with the violation of their parliamentary competences.
Subsequently, a similar statement to the court appealed the prosecutor of the RF subject. The judge accepted the application for review, held a hearing in which the prosecutor made a conclusion on the case. Decision of the court application was granted.
Are the actions of the court? What procedural order of consideration and resolution of cases on challenging normative legal acts?