Objective number 9
JSC "Polymer" appealed to the arbitration court against the Research Institute of "Azot" for recognition of the right of prior to the output of 300 units per year.
The arbitration court ruled that the plaintiff recognized the right of prior use of 200 units per year.
The appeal is not considered.
The appeal court examined the case on the complaint of the Research Institute of "Azot", changed the court's decision recognizing the right of prior use of the plaintiff in the amount of 120 units per year.
Entered into force verdict of the district court found that in that case, the arbitration court expert Petrov gave false conclusion, which entailed the imposition of unreasonable decisions. In connection with this, RI "Azot" has expressed its intention to initiate the arbitration court review proceedings held in the case of judicial decisions.
Which court of arbitration shall be filed an application for review of judicial acts on newly discovered evidence?