- Arts & Culture 5952
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 317
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 76477
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2513
- Coursework 15782
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 571
- Ecology 6
- Economy 82
- English 78
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17626
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 3
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13871
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14894
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 151
- Tests 9245
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 364
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3060
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Property Management Committee of Kostroma
Uploaded: 31.10.2019
Content: S19-277.docx 13,15 kB
Product description
The Property Management Committee of the city of Kostroma appealed to the Kostroma Regional Arbitration Court with a claim for the seizure of municipal property (building) from someone else´s illegal possession of the small enterprise Kostromaarchproekt. The controversial building was provided by the decision of the city executive committee to the Kostroma organization of the Union of Architects of the RSFSR for free to host the Kostromaarchproekt creative architectural and design workshop. According to the plaintiff, now the building is owned by a small enterprise, which is not the assignee of the workshop and therefore owns it illegally.
The defendant objected to the claim on the following grounds. The Executive Committee of the City Executive Committee at one time handed over the controversial structure as an emergency without residual value for reconstruction. For these purposes, a land plot was allocated on which the building was located. The workshop was entrusted with the development of the project and reconstruction. The work was carried out by the workshop at its own expense, the building was completely rebuilt according to a new project.
According to the decision of the Union of Architects of Kostroma, the architectural and design workshop was transformed into the small enterprise Kostromaarchproekt with the rights of a legal entity, whose charter was approved in the prescribed manner.
The defendant believes that he is the assignee of the former workshop, so the structure passed to him legally. In addition, the previous structure is no longer there, as a new object has been created. Solve the case.
Additional information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |