- Arts & Culture 5934
- Business & Economics 689
- Computers 310
- Dictionaries & Encyclopedias 81
- Education & Science 75718
- Abstracts 252
- Astrology 4
- Astronomy 1
- Biology 8
- Chemistry 2221
- Coursework 15444
- Culture 9
- Diplomas 411
- Drawings 574
- Ecology 5
- Economy 83
- English 75
- Ethics, Aesthetics 3
- For Education Students 17597
- Foreign Languages 11
- Geography 2
- Geology 1
- History 89
- Maps & Atlases 5
- Mathematics 13850
- Musical Literature 2
- Pedagogics 19
- Philosophy 23
- Physics 14821
- Political Science 5
- Practical Work 101
- Psychology 60
- Religion 4
- Russian and culture of speech 8
- School Textbooks 7
- Sexology 42
- Sociology 9
- Summaries, Cribs 87
- Test Answers 150
- Tests 9243
- Textbooks for Colleges and Universities 32
- Theses 24
- To Help Graduate Students 14
- To Help the Entrant 37
- Vetting 362
- Works 13
- Информатика 10
- Engineering 3059
- Fiction 696
- House, Family & Entertainment 107
- Law 132
- Website Promotion 71
Solution of the problem, an example of judicial practice and plot
Refunds: 0
Uploaded: 04.12.2014
Content: 18.doc 34 kB
Product description
Solution of the problem, an example of judicial practice and plot
The company "Ecotone" specializes in the design and manufacture of devices for water purification. The company owns several patents for inventions and a number of its original designs used as a trade secret. The greatest demand among consumers last two years, the device uses "Eco-P2", which uses a unique water purification technology that has no analogues in the world.
Participating in the exhibition, specialists of "Ecotone" found that the company "Eksima" at its booth demonstrates the device for water purification, which by its characteristics is very similar to the device "Eco-P2." The study showed that the company "Eksima" used in his unit on the same technology of water purification, which the company "Ecotone".
Since the information on the application of the technology was classified and could not be obtained through an analysis of the device "Eco-P2", the company "Ecotone" came to the conclusion that they have known of "Eksima" through some of the developers of the device. In particular, suspicion fell on the technology M., who was recently fired for repeated violations of labor discipline, and got a job in the company "Eksima."
The company "Ecotone" complained to the competition authority, in which he asked to ban the use of classified competitor technologies and to oblige Company "Eksima" not to disclose information about it to third parties. In his review of "Eksima" stated that developed the technology independently.
What are the prospects for the protection of the interests of the company "Ecotone" in this cpore? How is the burden of proof between the parties to the circumstances relevant to the case?
Feedback
0Period | |||
1 month | 3 months | 12 months | |
0 | 0 | 0 | |
0 | 0 | 0 |