Nesuny citizen, being an invalid of the second group, was detained at the time of exit from the shop floor store with a bottle of wine, cost 1,100 rubles, for which he is not paid, passing by the cash register. With regard Nesunova was drawn on administrative violation stipulated st.7.27 the Administrative Code and the decision of the magistrate, he was appointed administrative punishment in the form of administrative detention for five days.
District Attorney lodged against the decision the magistrate, stating that the actions of Nesunova there are signs of a criminal offense, so it can not be brought to administrative responsibility. The District Court reversed the decision of the magistrate and the proceedings terminated on the grounds specified in Clause 2 Part 1 of the Administrative Code st.24.5 in the absence of an administrative offense, stating that he could not dispose of nesuny stolen.
Give legal analysis of the case, describe the features and elements of an administrative offense under the Administrative Code st.7.27. Does the law handed down in the case of judicial decisions?