Before starting the study of a problem in any science, be it physics, biology, or TGP, you need to prove its relevance. It is necessary for himself to answer the question: "useful whether to be my job? "Otherwise the time spent creating huge theories that then remain on paper, will be wasted.
The research theme "Human Rights" I was doing before entering the AAP. These are the knowledge and the ability to large law library allowed me not only to continue the research, but also to understand the issues at stake is much deeper.
Of course, almost any question relating to the rights in our country, is important. Russian legislation, despite its youth, in line with many international standards, the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993 is considered one of the best in the world. Such legislation would be a good regulator of social relations, but so far those are not becoming, but our government is too slow approaching legal. The reason for this I would like to learn in the process.
Most of the rights and freedoms that we have, provided by the state: we can learn because we have built for schools and universities, we can take care of your health, because we have to set up a hospital, we can defend our interests, for us, there are the courts. But the power we entrusted the realization of their rights, much stronger than all of us. And if that power comes out of our control, that the defense of human rights and freedoms in their turn offender. This is precisely the situation in the USSR, when the state decides what rights a person has and what not.
To State does not exceed its powers and did not go out of control of its citizens, and the right has an institution called the "Human Rights". Human rights regulate the relationship between the authorities and the people, so the latter to be protected by the authorities, just need a specific set of rights. And to ensure that everyone can get to know him, and if necessary defend, requires a clear layout and presentation of these rights. While our legislators to do so failed. Therefore, I believe that human rights in our country should not be left to the level at which is now.
And in themselves human rights every year becomes more and more contentious and controversial moments. For example, each person has the right to life, but what about abortion? Or, all have the right to secrecy of correspondence, but lately it helps in the commission of terrorist acts, should not limit it?