When a contract of insurance housing (2009)

Affiliates: 0,25 $ — how to earn
Pay with:
i agree with "Terms for Customers"
Sold: 0
Refunds: 0

Uploaded: 15.01.2011
Content: 3383.zip (12,6 kB)

Seller

HotRef information about the seller and his items
offlineAsk a question

Seller will give you a gift certificate in the amount of 14,87 RUB for a positive review of the product purchased..

Description

Objective 1


At the conclusion of the contract of insurance of residential houses and baths from the fire for a period of 2 years, the insurer Serapionov, agreeing with the insurer, the essential terms of the contract, leave a few blank graph, because they do not know exactly what materials the house was built and the technology of construction (he bought the house and bath already constructed form). Insured promised, if possible, to get this information and pass them to the insurance company.
After the occurrence of the insured event (Circuit wiring and partially burned Bath House injured), the insurance company refused to pay the insured in the insurance, considering the contract null and void due to non-response insurer. In addition, the insurance company said that the insurer reported false information about the absence of home ownership with the neighboring buildings. As it turned out, during the conclusion of the insurance contract in the immediate vicinity (5 meters) from the spa bath log cabin was a neighbor Poryvayeva. Serapionov same in the contract stated that at a distance of 10 meters from his summer residence there are no buildings.
Insured Serapionov believed that the insurance company had to inspect the house and baths, and if necessary, make an examination. For information about the blockhouse baths neighbor he considered irrelevant as the data logs in the place were piled temporarily not affected by the fire, and the bath itself is going to build on Poryvaeva elsewhere.
Considering that after the occurrence of the insured event, the insurance contract ceased to have effect, Serapion, stopped paying regular premiums and sued in the court for the recovery of insurance compensation.
Analyze the arguments of the parties and decide the case.

Task 2


After the death of Satova 10 July 2006 remains the property: house, household furnishings and goods, cash contribution in the amount of 200 thousand rubles, the car.
In 2004 Satov bequeathed all the property to his friend Rozanov. In 2005, the notary certified Satova new will in which all property is transferred for the benefit of his daughter from his first marriage - Lydia. A few months later, submitting an application to the notary, Satov overturned the will drawn up in 2005
Inheritance claim: Satova wife - Julia, who lived with him until his death, the former spouse - Alexander, whom he divorced in 1990, the daughter of Lydia and his longtime friend Rozanov. Son Matthew died before the opening of the inheritance; He is survived by his wife Anna and two children (Alex and Eugene). Another son, Paul, died after the opening of the inheritance, without having had time to accept it. With him he lived his wife Natalia and daughter Elena.
Who will be called upon to inherit, and how property is to be distributed?

Additional information

Remember that any finished work needs work and can not be used as a final product.

Feedback

0
No feedback yet.
Period
1 month 3 months 12 months
0 0 0
0 0 0
Seller will give you a gift certificate in the amount of 14,87 RUB for a positive review of the product purchased..
In order to counter copyright infringement and property rights, we ask you to immediately inform us at support@plati.market the fact of such violations and to provide us with reliable information confirming your copyrights or rights of ownership. Email must contain your contact information (name, phone number, etc.)